Reviewing the Agudas Chasidei Chabad v. Russian Federation, et al. Dispute
Introduction

Introduction
Introduction
The normative and policy-setting functions of the World Health Organization (âWHOâ) have been substantially influenced by the differences of opinion within WHOâs membership about the impact of trade and intellectual property (âIPâ) rules on public health. In particular, WHO members differ as to the organizationâs role in addressing the perceived failure of the pharmaceutical market to generate safe and affordable medicines for diseases predominantly affecting developing countries.
Introduction
Introduction
Introduction
Introduction
After years of controversy, a small group of countries, including the United States and European Union member states, announced in December 2010 that they had finalized a new "Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement"[1] ("ACTA"). With the negotiations complete, attention has turned to a question that may at first appear obscure, but is in fact of enormous importance: Can the U.S. President make the agreement on his own, without Congressional approval?
Introduction
I. Introduction
Googleâs recent decision to stop censoring its search results in China reflects the challenging position in which providers of information and communication technologies find themselves today. This Insight provides an overview of the debate about Googleâs provision of search services in China and describes the framework of corporate social responsibility that applies to Internet providers operating in countries that restrict expression online.
II. Internet Regulation in China
I. Introduction
I. Introduction
The power to tax is the power to destroy, or at the very least, the power to make imports of menâs gloves more expensive than imports of womenâs gloves. An international business person importing goods into the United States might think that a law which treated differently an identical menâs and womenâs product would somehow run afoul of the United States Constitutionâs Equal Protection Clause. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) has held that it does not.