Efforts to define “Indigenous Peoples” have long been a source of contention in international law. Defining indigeneity can exacerbate problems around legitimacy, authenticity and representation; the very vectors of the human rights discourse that the participation of Indigenous Peoples is meant to remedy. Yet, the lack of a simple definition of Indigenous Peoples has created a host of problems including excuses for states to deny the existence of Indigenous Peoples, to limit their human rights, including rights to participation at the UN, and to define Indigenous Peoples as minorities in an effort to make them subjects only of domestic law.
Art 33(1) of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) provides that ‘Indigenous peoples have the right to determine their own identity or membership in accordance with their customs and traditions’. Is this right recognised or respected in settler legal systems? In this panel, leading experts will explore how settler national legal systems recognise, or define for their purposes, indigeneity.
Karen Drake (Wabigoon Lake Ojibway Nation), Associate Professor, Osgoode Hall Law School
Kirsty Gover, Professor, University of Melbourne
Timothy Goodwin (Yuin people), Barrister, Victoria Bar
Kent McNeil, Professor, Osgoode Hall Law School
Shea Esterling, University of Canterbury, and Co-chair of ASIL’s Rights of Indigenous Peoples Interest Group (Moderator)
Harry Hobbs, University of Technology Sydney, and Co-chair of ASIL’s Rights of Indigenous Peoples Interest Group (Moderator)
This session is organized by ASIL’s Rights of Indigenous Peoples Interest Group