On July 28, 2000, the United Nations
Economic and Social Council decided to
establish, by consensus resolution, a
"Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues"
as a subsidiary organ of the Council.
ECOSOC Res. 2000/22 (available at: http://www.un.org/documents/ecosoc/dec/2000/edec2000-inf2-add2.pdf,
pp. 50-52).
2) Significance
The Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues
formally integrates indigenous peoples
and their representatives into the structure
of the United Nations. It marks the first
time that representatives of states and
non-state actors have been accorded parity
in a permanent representative body within
the United Nations Organization proper.
3) Background
The establishment of the Permanent
Forum on Indigenous Issues is a significant
milestone in the decades-long struggle
of indigenous peoples to regain standing
within the global community. At the intergovernmental
level, a permanent forum dealing with
issues facing indigenous peoples was first
proposed by the 1993 World Conference
on Human Rights in Vienna. When the General
Assembly adopted the program of activities
for the International Decade of the World's
Indigenous People (1995-2004), it identified
the establishment of the Forum as one
of the main objectives of the Decade.
United Nations High Commissioner for Human
Rights Mary Robinson, Coordinator of the
Decade, welcomed the decision as a "historic
step forward." "The Permanent Forum,"
she said, "promises to give indigenous
peoples a unique voice within the United
Nations system, commensurate with the
unique problems which many indigenous
people still face, but also with the unique
contribution they make to the human rights
dialogue, at the local, national and international
levels."
For centuries, indigenous peoples had
been conquered, dispossessed and marginalized.
In the 1970s, however, a marked resurgence
occurred: indigenous peoples started to
organize themselves across national boundaries
and made their voices heard internationally.
Following a 1974 landmark study of their
issues of discrimination, undertaken on
behalf of the UN Sub-Commission on the
Prevention of Discrimination and Protection
of Minorities by Special Rapporteur José
Martinez Cobo (Ecuador), the United Nations
founded a Working Group on Indigenous
Populations in 1982. The pre-eminent leader
and Chairperson of this Working Group
since its beginning has been Dr. Erica-Irene
Daes of Greece. Under her aegis, indigenous
peoples' representatives gained an unprecedented
voice and presence at the United Nations
level. Prior milestones of her work were
the 1993 Draft Declaration of the Rights
of Indigenous Peoples, now being reviewed
by an ad hoc open-ended inter-sessional
working group of the Human Rights Commission,
and the 1996 Draft Principles and Guidelines
on the Protection of the Heritage of Indigenous
People, as revised by a United Nations
seminar in February/March 2000. The latter
draft has now been transmitted by the
Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection
of Human Rights to the Commission on Human
Rights for its further action.
4) Structure
The Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues
will be a subsidiary organ of the Economic
and Social Council. It will consist of
eight members nominated by governments
and elected by the Council, and eight
members to be appointed by the President
of the Council following broad consultations
with indigenous organizations and groups.
The selection process is to take into
account the diversity and geographical
distribution of the world's indigenous
peoples as well as principles of transparency,
representativeness and equal opportunity.
All members of the Forum are to serve
in their personal capacity as independent
experts on indigenous issues for a period
of three years with the possibility of
re-election or reappointment for one further
period. Governments, intergovernmental
organizations, NGOs in consultative status
with the Council, as well as organizations
of indigenous people complying with procedures
previously applied by the Working Group
on Indigenous Populations, may participate
in the Forum as observers.
5) Functions and Procedure
According to ECOSOC Resolution 2000/22,
the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues
"shall serve as an advisory body to the
Council with a mandate to discuss indigenous
issues within the mandate of the Council
relating to economic and social development,
culture, the environment, education, health
and human rights."
In so doing, the Permanent Forum shall
"(a) Provide expert advice and recommendations
on indigenous issues to the Council, as
well as to programmes, funds and agencies
of the United Nations, through the Council;
(b) Raise awareness and promote the integration
and coordination of activities relating
to indigenous issues within the United Nations
system;
(c) Prepare and disseminate information
on indigenous issues." (para. 2)
Furthermore, except as modified by
the Council, the rules of procedure for
subsidiary organs of the Council shall
apply, and "the principle of consensus
shall govern the work of the Permanent
Forum" (para. 3). The Forum "shall hold
an annual session of ten working days
at the United Nations Office at Geneva
or at United Nations Headquarters or at
such other place as the Permanent Forum
may decide in accordance with existing
financial rules and regulations of the
United Nations." (para. 4).
6) Open Issues
One issue left to be resolved is exact
interpretation of the Forum's mandate.
Influential statements about the proper
role of the Forum have been somewhat broader
than the literal wording of its mandate
would suggest. In her report on "Indigenous
Peoples and Their Relationship To Land,"
U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2000/25, Special
Rapporteur Erica-Irene Daes recommends
at pages 39-40, para. 152:
"The recently established Permanent
Forum for Indigenous People should consider
playing a constructive role regarding
problems pertaining to land and resource
rights and environmental protection. In
particular, consideration should be given
to the following:
(a) The creation of a fact-finding
body, with a mandate to make site visits
and to prepare reports concerning particular
indigenous land and resource issues,
(b) The creation of an indigenous
land and resource ombudsman or office
which could provide response, mediation
and reconciliation services;
(c) The creation of a complaint
mechanism or procedure for human rights
violations that pertain to indigenous
land and resource situations;
(d) The creation of a body with
'peace-seeking' powers to investigate,
recommend solutions, conciliate, mediate
and otherwise assist in preventing or
ending violence in situations regarding
indigenous land rights;
(e) The creation of a procedure
whereby countries would be called upon
to make periodic reports with regard to
their progress in protecting the land
and resource rights of indigenous people."
It is unclear at this point whether
the Permanent Forum will be able to hold
sessions at United Nations Headquarters
in New York.
Finally, the continuing role, even
the existence, of the UN Working Group
on Indigenous Populations after the establishment
of the Forum is being questioned. Resolution
2000/22 states on this point: "[O]nce
the Permanent Forum has been established
and has held its first annual session,"
the Council will "review ... all existing
mechanisms, procedures and programmes
within the United Nations concerning indigenous
issues, including the Working Group on
Indigenous Populations, with a view to
rationalizing activities, avoiding duplication
and overlap and promoting effectiveness."
(para. 8). The resolution thus ensures
the continued existence of the United
Nations Working Group throughout 2001
and 2002.
7) Evaluation
The Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues
as established does not meet the entirety
of aspirations of indigenous peoples,
either with respect to its name (it sidesteps
continuing debate over the use of the
terms "indigenous people" or "peoples"),
its structure (the equal match-up between
states and indigenous representatives
has been criticized as ignoring the power
differential between the two groups),
or with respect to its mandate (the advisory,
educational and recommendatory functions
outlined in Resolution 2000/22 will have
to be interpreted broadly to respond to
indigenous peoples' concerns). Still,
it constitutes a bridgehead of international
agency for indigenous peoples within the
formal framework of the organized global
community. It will have to be funded appropriately
by the United Nations regular budget to
play a significant role, in particular
to enable representatives of indigenous
peoples to be physically present at its
meetings. As in every organization, the
personalities chosen as its members will
be critical to its success.
For Further Reading:
S. JAMES ANAYA, INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN INTERNATIONAL
LAW (1996)
MAIVAN CLECH LAM, AT THE EDGE OF THE STATE:
INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND SELF-DETERMINATION
(2000)
Siegfried Wiessner, Rights and Status
of Indigenous Peoples: A Global Comparative
and International Legal Analysis, 12
HARVARD HUMAN RIGHTS JOURNAL 57 (1999)
About the Authors:
John Carey, Editor of the United Nations
Law Reports (unofficial reports on legal
matters in the UN), is a former Vice President
of the ASIL and former member of the editorial
board of the AJIL. Besides serving as Alternate
US Member of the UN Sub-Commission of Prevention
and Protection of Human Rights during all
its sessions up to 1990 at which indigenous
rights were considered, he is a former Adjunct
Assistant Professor at NYU. At NYU, he also
earned the LL.M. in International Law while
a partner at the Coudert Brothers law firm.
He serves as the Chair of the ASIL Interest
Group on Indigenous Peoples' Rights.
Siegfried Wiessner, Professor of Law at
St. Thomas University School of Law and
Director of its LL.M./M.A. program in Intercultural
Human Rights. He has published widely in
the field of international indigenous law
and has chaired the steering committees
of five tribal sovereignty symposia held
at St. Thomas University since December
1994. In February/March 2000, he was appointed
facilitator of the drafting commission on
principles of the UN seminar on the revision
of the draft principles and guidelines on
the protection of the heritage of indigenous
people. He is the Chair-Elect of the ASIL
Interest Group on Indigenous Peoples' Rights.
__________________________________________________________________________
ASIL Insights are
intended to identify international law issues in
order to provide a basis for informed discussion
of current events. They are not intended to be definitive,
and they do not necessarily reflect the views of
all members of The American Society of International
Law. The Society itself takes no position on these
issues.
ASIL Insights may be found on the ASIL
Web Site.
Educational copying is permitted with due
acknowledgement.