Request for Extradition
of Miguel Cavallo from Mexico to Spain for Alleged Torture
in Argentina
By Frederic L. Kirgis
September 2000
For the third time in the past two years,
a former government official accused of serious human
rights violations in his home country faces possible prosecution
elsewhere. According to news reports, Miguel Cavallo,
an Argentine official during the reign of the military
junta in that country from 1976 to 1983, has been arrested
in Mexico under a warrant and extradition request from
the same judge in Spain who in 1998 requested the United
Kingdom to extradite Augusto Pinochet, the former Chilean
head of state, to Spain on charges of torture and other
human rights violations. Cavallo allegedly participated
in the torture of Spanish citizens in Argentina while
the junta was in power.
In the other two recent cases (involving
Augusto Pinochet of Chile and Hissène Habré
of Chad), the person accused was a former head of state.
Thus, questions were raised as to possible head-of-state
immunity from extradition and prosecution. No such questions
are raised here.
As in those two cases, though, there are
possible questions under the international Convention
against Torture, which recognizes the penal jurisdiction
of any state whose citizens were the victims of the alleged
torture, and also recognizes the jurisdiction of any state
that has custody of the accused in its territory even
though the alleged torture occurred elsewhere. The Convention
(a multilateral treaty) allows the parties to it to consider
it as an extradition treaty. Argentina, Mexico and Spain
are all parties to the Convention.
The Convention was opened for signature
in December 1984 and entered into force in 1987. Since
the military junta in Argentina fell from power in 1983,
a question could arise--as it did in the Pinochet case--regarding
the Convention's applicability to acts that occurred before
it entered into force. But international law contains
certain peremptory norms that apply independently of any
treaty and that are enforceable universally (i.e., by
any state that has custody over the accused). The prohibition
of torture is recognized as one of those peremptory norms.
A Mexican or Spanish tribunal might consider whether Cavallo's
acts, if proven, would be criminal under international
law even though the alleged torture occurred before the
Convention was signed or entered into force. The request
for extradition to Spain has come long after the Convention
entered into force, so Mexico would be justified in honoring
it under the Convention so long as the acts were illegal
and subject to universal jurisdiction when committed.
About the Author:
Frederic L. Kirgis is Law School Association Alumni Professor
at Washington and Lee University School of Law. He has
written a book and several articles on United Nations
law, and is a member of the Board of Editors of the American
Journal of International Law.
_________________________________________________________________________________
ASIL Insights are intended
to identify international law issues in order to provide
a basis for informed discussion of current events. They
are not intended to be definitive, and they do not necessarily
reflect the views of all members of The American Society
of International Law. The Society itself takes no position
on these issues.
ASIL Insights may be found on the ASIL
Web Site.
Educational copying is permitted with due
acknowledgement.