ASIL The American Society of International Law
Home About ASIL Membership In the news Careers Resources Events
   
Search
Advanced Search
 

International Law In Brief

December 21 - 25, 1998
Developments in international law, prepared by the
Attorney-Editors of
International Legal Materials
The American Society of International Law

About International Law In Brief




From the Editors

The Executive Committee of The American Society of International Law is soliciting comments regarding whether International Law In Brief should be continued past February 1999.  We appreciate the many comments that we have received to date.  If you have not already done so and would like to express an opinion as to the continuation of this service, please send an e.mail to david.levy@his.com  All messages will be forwarded to the ASIL Executive Committee.



Judicial Decisions

ICTY: Prosecutor v. Furundzija, IT-95-17/1-T (Dec. 10, 1998)

Furundzija, the local commander of the Croatian Defence Council Military Police unit known as the "Jokers", was charged with two counts of the violations of the laws and customs of war, arising out of interrogations of a Muslim woman and a Bosnian Croat man in which Furundzija questioned the pair while "B", another member of the Jokers, threatened sexual violence against the woman, beat them, and raped the woman in the presence of the man and others. paras. 25-26.  The Trial Chamber found that it had "no doubt that the accused and Accused B, as commanders, divided the process of interrogation by performing different functions.  The role of the accused was to question, while Accused B's role was to assault and threaten in order to elicit the required information...." para. 130.

As an initial matter, the Trial Chamber characterized the prohibition against torture as a peremptory norm of  international law, which is owed toward all nations as an erga omnes obligation, and noted that rape which occurs during interrogation may amount to torture. paras. 144, 147, 151-153, 163.  The Trial Chamber emphasized that "if an official interrogates a detainee while another person is inflicting severe pain or suffering, the interrogator is as guilty of torture as the person causing the severe pain or suffering, even if he does not in any way physically participate in such infliction." para. 256. The Trial Chamber distinguished accomplice liability for aiding and abetting from that of a perpetrator:  "(i) to be guilty of torture as a perpetrator (or co-perpetrator), the accused must participate in an integral part of the torture and partake of the purpose behind the torture, that is the intent to obtain information or a confession, to punish or intimidate, humiliate, coerce or discriminate against the victim or a third person. (ii) to be guilty of torture as an aider or abettor, the accused must assist in some way which has a substantial effect on the perpetration of the crime and with knowledge that torture is taking place." para. 257.

Applying those principles, the Trial Chamber found Furundzija guilty as co-participant, in the torture of the Moslem woman by virtue of his interrogation of her "as an integral part of the torture, " as well as of the Croatian man who was beaten and forced to watch the sexual attacks on the woman. para. 267-268.  The Trial Chamber further found Furundzija guilty of aiding and abetting the rape and sexual assault on the woman, although he was not physically in the room during the attacks, on the grounds that his "presence and continued interrogation of [the woman] encouraged Accused B and substantially contributed to the criminal acts committed by him." para. 273.  Furundzija was sentenced to ten years imprisonment for the first count and eight years imprisonment for the second count, both sentences to be served concurrently, less a deduction for time served in pretrial detention. DL
download in Adobe pdf format http://www.un.org/icty/furundzija/judgment/FinalFurjud.pdf

U.S. Second Circuit: Rein v. Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 98-7467 (Dec. 15, 1998)

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the District Court that the exercise of civil jurisdiction against Libya arising out of the downing of PanAm flight 103 over Lockerbie pursuant to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, as amended by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) is not an unconstitutional delegation of the power to establish the jurisdiction of the federal courts.  The Second Circuit held that as that Libya was already on the list of state sponsors of terrorism at the time that the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act was passed by Congress, jurisdiction over Libya existed at the moment that the AEDPA amendment became law, without requiring the exercise of discretion by Executive branch through the State Department.  In dicta, the court noted that the issue of unconstitutional delegation might be brought by a state sued under the amended act that was not on the list at the time of passage of the AEDPA. DL
http://www.law.pace.edu/lawlib/legal/us-legal/judiciary/second-circuit/test3/98-7467.opn.html

Back to the top


Reports and Other Documents

WTO: Working Group on Transparency in Government Procurement - Report (1998) to the General Council, WT/WGTGP/2 (Nov. 17, 1998)

The Working Group on Transparency in Government Procurement issued a report on issues relating to an eventual agreement on transparency in government procurement.  An initial matter discussed was whether transparency disciplines should be applied to both international procurements as well as procurements limited to national suppliers. sect. I. The question of whether concession agreements, privatizations, and privately-financed infrastructure projects (build-operate-transfer or BOT projects) should be subject to a transparency agreement was discussed. sect I(C). A range of views regarding the applicability of transparency measures to various forms of procurement, ranging from tendering to sole source purchasing was considered. sect. II. The Working Group stressed the importance of publication of information on national procurement legislation and procedures and that publication requirements could be satisfied through publication in either print or electronic media, at the discretion of Members. sect. III.  Section IV presents views regarding details on information to be provided in notices of procurement opportunities, including evaluation criteria, clarifications and modifications, and notification language and form of publication, while Section V suggests setting forth a general principle for establishing time periods for various pre-evaluation stages in the procurement process.  The usefulness of bidder registration and qualification was noted, as was the essential feature of procurement transparency that decisions on contract awards should be made "strictly on the basis of the evaluation criteria." sect. VI, VII. The provision of post-award information to bidders, including unsuccessful bidders, was discussed, as was the importance of a domestic review mechanism in order to ensure accountability and procedural fairness. paras. 66-71, sect. VIII. Other issues considered in the report include the maintenance of procurement decision records; the use of information technology in procurement; notification of procurement information to other Members; the potential applicability of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism to procurement transparency; and technical cooperation and special and differential treatment for developing countries. sect. IX-XII.  DL
Download in MS Word  http://www.wto.org/wto/new/wtwgtgp2.doc



News and Notes

The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative released a list of European products which will be subject to a 100% import duty as a result of the dispute over E.U. implementation of WTO Dispute Resolution Body rulings decisions concerning the E.U. banana importation regime. The list of products, which the United States will submit to the WTO in a request for authorization to suspend trade concessions on January 21st, include (1) pecorino cheese; (2) sweet biscuits, waffles and wafers; (3) bath preparations; (4) candles; (5) forms of polymers of propylene; (6) plastic-covered handbags; (7) certain plastic articles carried in a pocket or handbag; (8) felt paper and paperboard; (9) folded cartons and boxes; (10) greeting cards; (11) lithographs; (12) cashmere sweaters; (13) cotton print bed linen; (14) certain types of lead-acid batteries; (15) household coffee and tea makers; and (16) chandeliers and other ceiling and wall lighting fixtures.  Certain pork and olive products may also be added to the list, depending on public comment.  The U.S. stated that the withdrawal of trade concessions will not affect imports from the Netherlands or Denmark because of their voting record against the adoption of the new E.U. banana rules.
Download from U.S.T.R. in Adobe pdf format   http://www.ustr.gov/releases/1998/12/98-113.pdf

Senegal has announced a ban on female genital mutilation.  The executive ban has been submitted to the National Assembly to be formalized as legislation.  The B.B.C. reports that the penalty for the practice of female genital mutilation is up to five years imprisonment.

The Law Centre for European and International Cooperation (R.I.Z.) is hosting a conference, Non-Judicial Dispute Settlement in International Financial Transactions at the Crown Plaza Hotel in Cologne, Germany on March 22-23, 1998.   Among the speakers scheduled to participate are Norbert Horn, Ambassador Roberto McLean, Joe Norton, Jeswald Salacuse, Richard Kreindler, and Marc Steinberg.  For further information, visit the Conference web site, http://www.uni-koeln.de/jur-fak/riz/dispute.htm

Back to the top


International Law In Brief - Copyright 1998 - The American Society of International Law
Editors:  Elizabeth J. Fabrizio, David A. Levy
Intern:  Alice Epler
To comment on this publication, send an e.mail message to David A. Levy, Interim Editor at
david.levy@his.com
For membership information, visit us on the Internet
http://asil.org
 
 
 
Contact Us Site Map Privacy